盈彩网投资平台必赚方案_盈彩网投资平台手机版APP

来源：盈彩网投资平台官方2022-12-17 17:48

盈彩网投资平台必赚方案

目前北京重症患者救治情况，市卫健委发布— —******url:https://m.gmw.cn/2023-01/07/content_1303246850.htm,id:1303246850

　　1月6日，在北京新型冠状病毒感染疫情防控工作第433场新闻发布会上，北京市卫健委副主任、新闻发言人李昂介绍，医疗救治是当前工作的重点，北京市立足群众需求，采取扩增发热门诊、优化急救转运、畅通入院通道、强化医联体协作、加强重症救治等系列措施，有效缓解了就医压力。目前，全市门急诊量稳步回落，重症患者救治呈现向好趋势，仍处于高位。

　　李昂介绍，本市提升发热门诊接诊服务能力。发热门诊应开尽开，全市发热门诊和诊室总数达1263家，其中二级及以上医院303家、社区卫生服务机构960家；采取院内原址扩容、方舱转化、社区巡诊等方式扩容发热诊室数量，全市累计扩容诊室449个；充实发热门诊诊疗队伍，设置简易药房，满足单纯开药患者需求；通过互联网医疗、设置合作诊室和强化分级诊疗等措施，满足市民就诊需求。发热门诊接诊量从2022年12月15日最高峰7.3万人次，逐渐回落到2023年1月4日1.2万人次。

　　本市优化院前急救、急诊、住院流程。采取扩容增补急救资源、增加调度席位、分流咨询非急危重症需求电话，解决市民急救需求；提升全市急诊接诊和留观能力，截至2023年1月4日，全市急诊实有留观床位2472张，可转化急诊留观床位1312张，扩容达145.7%；做好院前急救和医院急诊衔接，打通患者入院治疗通道，实施跨科收治，分流急诊、重症、呼吸、感染等科室收治压力。急诊接诊量从2022年12月30日最高峰5.2万人次，逐渐回落至目前4.2万人次。

　　本市强化医联体协作。依托医联体建设网格化三级救治体系，推进分级诊疗。全市组建56个新冠网格化救治体系，每个网格均由一所三级医院（或区域医疗中心）作为牵头医院，与若干所二级医院、基层医疗机构建立分级转诊机制，基层医疗机构接诊超过自身救治能力的重症患者时，对口三级医院开通绿色通道，及时转诊救治，经三级医院诊疗并病情稳定的患者，转至下级医疗构机进行延续输液、吸氧等康复性治疗，有效分流三级医院诊疗压力。

　　本市加强社区医疗卫生机构能力建设。坚持关口前移，加强重点人群排查和早期介入管理，对65岁及以上老人、严重基础疾病和免疫力低下人群，做好健康监测，全面动态掌握居民健康情况，对病情症状做到早发现、早诊断、早治疗，防止病情转重。对符合在社区卫生服务机构用药条件的新冠重点人群，采取早期应用抗病毒药物，同时在全市社区卫生服务中心开展吸氧服务，为全市社区卫生服务中心（站）、村卫生室配备指氧夹4.5万个。

　　本市全力做好重症患者救治。扩容重症救治资源，全市ICU开放床位数从2022年12月中旬的3000余张增至7000余张，二级以上医疗机构经重症医学专业培训的医师数和护士数分别达到1.4万人和2.8万人。成立由知名专家组成的重症管理评估组，建立专家组分片巡查指导机制，按区域对全市收治重症患者的二级及以上医院进行巡诊和指导，提高重症患者救治规范化、同质化水平。

　　下一步，将继续聚焦“保健康、防重症”，全力以赴做好医疗救治工作，进一步加大医疗资源建设储备，分级分类救治患者，加强三级医疗救治体系建设，保障重点人群医疗健康服务，千方百计提高治愈率，降低重症率、病亡率，最大程度保障人民群众生命安全和身体健康。

　　转自：北京市新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控工作第433场新闻发布会

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.